Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-04-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-04-08 House Journal Page 0943 HB 44 CSSSHB 44(STA) was before the House in second reading. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representatives Birch, Millett, Wilson, and Saddler: Page 1, line 1, following "Act" (title amendment): Insert "relating to political action committees managed by legislators;" Page 1, line 13, following "value": Insert ", including support for a bill sponsored by another legislator who manages a political action committee that donated $500 or more to the legislator or a member of the legislator's immediate family in the immediately preceding 48 months" Representative Birch moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Grenn objected. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Saddler: 2017-04-08 House Journal Page 0944 Following "donated": Delete "$500" Insert "$50" Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Grenn objected. Representative LeDoux rose to a point of order regarding confining remarks to the amendment. The Speaker cautioned the member to confine remarks to the amendment. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 44(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Neuman Absent: Parish And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Representative LeDoux rose to a point of order regarding confining remarks to the amendment. 2017-04-08 House Journal Page 0945 The Speaker cautioned the member to confine remarks to the amendment. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 44(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Rauscher, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Excused: Neuman And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. CSSSHB 44(STA) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CSSSHB 44(STA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 44(STA) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 24 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnston, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson 2017-04-08 House Journal Page 0946 Excused: Neuman And so, CSSSHB 44(STA) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment. The House adjourned.